 Development Accounting with Intermediate GoodsEdinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series from Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh Abstract: Do intermediate inputs help explain aggregate and relative productivity differences across countries? They do, based on new stylized facts on cross-country relative prices and input-output relationships. That evidence motivates a simple development accounting framework that distinguishes between goods and service industries on the one hand, and nal and intermediate output on the other. The model diagnoses the impact of TFP on productivity, and yields the following results. Poorer countries are particularly ine cient in the production of intermediate relative to nal output, but they are not necessarily ine cient in goods relative to service industries. They feature low measured labor productivity in goods industries because these are intensive intermediate users, and because intermediate TFP is relatively low. The elasticity of aggregate TFP with respect to sector-neutral TFP is large, in the range of 1.8 to 2.2. Keywords: Development Accounting; Productivity; Intermediate Goods; TFP (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edn:esedps:272 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series from Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh 31 Buccleuch Place, EH8 9JT, Edinburgh. Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.