A partial life cycle assessment of the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of feeding 3-nitrooxypropanol and nitrate to cattle

Pablo S. Alvarez-Hess, Shannan M. Little, Peter J. Moate, Joe L. Jacobs, Karen A. Beauchemin and Richard J. Eckard

Agricultural Systems, 2019, vol. 169, issue C, 14-23

Abstract: Agricultural industries are faced with the challenge to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) such as nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). Approximately 27% of the GHG emissions generated by agriculture and 80% of the GHG emissions generated by livestock are in the form of CH4 from enteric fermentation and manure management. Two feed additives that have been shown to decrease enteric CH4 emissions are 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) and nitrate. However, data are lacking on the net impact of these CH4 mitigating additives on whole farm GHG emissions across different production systems. The objectives of this partial life cycle assessment (LCA) were: 1) to analyse the effect of 3-NOP and nitrate on whole farm GHG emissions of Australian and Canadian beef and dairy farms, and 2) to analyse the effect of different strategies of 3-NOP and nitrate feeding on whole farm GHG emissions. Two Australian dairy farms (ADF), one Australian beef farm (ABF), one Canadian dairy farm (CDF) and one Canadian beef farm (CBF) were modelled over the productive lifespans of dairy and beef herds. Australian farm GHG emissions were estimated based on the Australian National Greenhouse Gas Inventory method using the Greenhouse Accounting Framework calculators for beef and dairy. For the Canadian farms, total GHG emissions were estimated using Holos 3.0.3, a whole-farm software model. For all farms, the system boundary of the partial LCA was defined as the farm gate, including emissions associated with on-farm activities and emissions associated with production and transport of major production inputs. Both additives decreased whole farm GHG emissions; however, 3-NOP had a greater effect than nitrate. Feeding 3-NOP but not nitrate could be economical for both beef and dairy farms, depending on the cost of 3-NOP. It is concluded that 3-NOP can make an important contribution to reducing whole farm GHG emissions; however, a carbon offset method would have to be in place to incentivize its use in the livestock industries.

Keywords: Methane mitigation; Dairy production system; Beef production system; Partial life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X18307595
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agisys:v:169:y:2019:i:c:p:14-23

DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.11.008

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Systems is currently edited by J.W. Hansen, P.K. Thornton and P.B.M. Berentsen

More articles in Agricultural Systems from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().