Beef production simulation of nitrate and lipid supplements for pasture and rangeland fed enterprises

Malcolm J. McPhee, Mark Evered, Todd Andrews, David Pacheco, Holland C. Dougherty, Aaron B. Ingham, Steven Harden, Jason Crean, Leslie Roche, Danny J. Eastburn, James W. Oltjen, V. Hutton Oddy, Ermias Kebreab, John V. Nolan and Roger S. Hegarty

Agricultural Systems, 2019, vol. 170, issue C, 19-27

Abstract: Long-term effects of dietary supplements on productivity, economics, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of 2 beef enterprises were simulated, using AusBeef integrated with AusFarm®, across 30 years: Enterprise 1. Angus steers (1.5 head/ha) in New South Wales, Australia, grazing for 238 days/year, and Enterprise 2. British x Charolais steers (1.0 head/ha) in California, USA, grazing for 148 days/year. Simulation effects of 3 supplements with potential to reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions were evaluated: (1) nitrate (NO3¯), (2) lipid, and (3) NO3¯ + lipid. All supplementation effects were evaluated against a baseline simulation (i.e., no supplement). Results on beef production, rumen products, GHG emissions, and enterprise gross margins are reported. Simulations indicated that supplementing steers with lipid alone relative to the baseline in Enterprises 1 and 2: increased final live weight (LW) by 68 and 25 kg, decreased emissions intensity (EI) by 69 and 49 g CH4/kg live weight gain (LWG), and decreased total GHG by 0.08 and 0.04 t CO2-e/ha/year, respectively. Supplementing steers with NO3¯ + lipid relative to the baseline: increased final LW by 70 and 30 kg, decreased EI by 89 and 77 g CH4/kg LWG, and decreased total GHG by 0.27 and 0.12 t CO2-e/ha/year for Enterprises 1 and 2 respectively. The most profitable mitigation strategy, across all years, for Enterprise 1 was the lipid supplement with a median gross margin of $AUD753/ha and for Enterprise 2 was the NO3¯ + lipid supplement with a median gross margin of $AUD224/ha. The NO3¯ supplement alone was the least preferred option across both enterprises, consistently delivering lower returns than other options across the entire probability range. The results indicate the potential economic benefit of lipid supplementation, either alone or in combination with NO3¯, as GHG mitigation strategies that increase profitability and inhibit methanogenesis for beef production across diverse environments.

Keywords: Biophysical modelling; Carbon credit units; CDF; Emissions intensity; Gross margin; Profitability; Steers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X18308916
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agisys:v:170:y:2019:i:c:p:19-27

DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.12.006

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Systems is currently edited by J.W. Hansen, P.K. Thornton and P.B.M. Berentsen

More articles in Agricultural Systems from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().