EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Bioenergy and full carbon dioxide sinking in sugarcane-biorefinery with post-combustion capture and storage: Techno-economic feasibility

Hudson Bolsoni Carminati, Raquel de Freitas D. Milão, José Luiz de Medeiros and Ofélia de Queiroz F. Araújo

Applied Energy, 2019, vol. 254, issue C

Abstract: Sugarcane plantations promote impressive drainage of atmospheric carbon dioxide reaching 781 t/h for a 1000 t/h sugarcane-biorefinery. For first-generation bioethanol sugarcane-biorefineries, only 10% of sugarcane carbon dioxide equivalent leaves as hydrous-ethanol, while 90% return to atmosphere through bagasse-fired power cogeneration in steam-Rankine cycles. Thus, a sugarcane-biorefinery exports two bioenergy flows – electricity and hydrous-ethanol – and its impressive Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage potential is wasted. Capture of fermentation carbon dioxide merely means 5% of Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage efficiency. This work assesses a new sugarcane-biorefinery concept dramatically raising the Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage efficiency. With fermentation carbon dioxide already captured, it is advocated to implement 90% post-combustion capture of flue-gas carbon dioxide. Then, captured carbon dioxide is compressed and traded as Enhanced Oil Recovery agent transported to deep-water offshore oil fields via high-pressure pipelines counting on topographic gravitational effects to lower compression power. Aggregating pipeline/compression investment to the biorefinery, it is shown that such new Plantation-Biorefinery-Post-Combustion-Pipeline-Oil-Recovery enterprise is technically feasible for 5.22 MtCO2/y of Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage capacity and is economically feasible under certain conditions: (i) idle pipeline capacity rental to fossil carbon emitters at 10–20 USD/tCO2; (ii) recovered oil revenues traded at 1–2 bbl/tCO2 and 50–80 USD/bbl; (iii) carbon-taxation at 40–80 USD/tCO2; and (iv) carbon Cap-and-Trade at 30–70 USD/tCO2. Under such conditions the Plantation-Biorefinery-Post-Combustion-Pipeline-Oil-Recovery can attain 7 MMMUSD net value and 6 years payback-time.

Keywords: Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage; BECCS; Enhanced oil recovery; CO2 pipeline; Ethanol biorefineries; Negative CO2 emissions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919313200
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:254:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919313200

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113633

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:254:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919313200