EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing water footprint and water scarcity footprint of energy demand in China’s six megacities

Xiawei Liao, Xu Zhao, Wenfeng Liu, Ruoshui Li, Xiaoxi Wang, Wenpeng Wang and Martin R. Tillotson

Applied Energy, 2020, vol. 269, issue C, No S0306261920306498

Abstract: Water is required throughout the life-cycle processes of energy production to meet the growing energy demands in China’s megacities. However, the spatially explicit impact on water scarcity both inside and outside the megacity boundaries from megacities’ energy demands remains unknown. We quantified and compared the water footprint and water scarcity footprint for final energy demand (WFE and WSFE) in China’s megacities from a consumption perspective. Six acknowledged megacities, i.e. Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing, Shenzhen and Guangzhou, were evaluated with an extended multi-region input–output model. The results showed that these megacities were endowed with only 2.60% of the national available water resources, but their WFE (WSFE) made up nearly 14.00% (13.50%) of the national total. The megacities located in Northern China generated a larger WSFE in their WFE than the cities in Southern China. Energy demands in these megacities were heavily dependent on scarce water sourced from beyond their administrative boundaries, together importing 84.10% of WSFE from elsewhere. Electricity demand dominated the volumetric water consumption, representing 52.00% of the WFE. The distribution was different for scarce water consumption, with coal demand generating 34.00% of total WSFE, followed by electricity (31.00%) and petroleum (26.00%). Although Northern China is faced with dire water scarcity, its scarce water is still being predominantly outsourced to support energy demands in both Northern and Southern megacities, mainly due to their coal and petroleum reserves. Location-specific pathways and foci should be applied for different megacities to decouple their energy demands and their scarce water consumption.

Keywords: Input-output analysis; Virtual water; Virtual scarce water; Water-energy nexus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920306498
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:269:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920306498

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115137

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (repec@elsevier.com).

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:269:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920306498