Reducing waste heat to the minimum: Thermodynamic assessment of the M-power cycle concept applied to micro Gas Turbines

Ward De Paepe, Alessio Pappa, Marina Montero Carrero, Laurent Bricteux and Francesco Contino

Applied Energy, 2020, vol. 279, issue C, No S0306261920313647

Abstract: To fully embrace its opportunities in future decentralized power production, the current mGT has to become more flexible in terms of operation, i.e. decoupling heat and power production. Cycle humidification during periods with low heat demand is a possible route to handle this issue. Indeed, cycle humidification has already been proven to increase the mGT electrical efficiency. Nevertheless, even when applying the most advanced humidified cycle concept, i.e. the REgenerative EVAPoration cycle, the electrical performance increase remains rather limited. In this perspective, the more recent Maisotsenko (or M-power) cycle concept offers a larger potential for humidification, even though its potential was only proven on large-scale gas turbine cycles and never applied to the smaller mGT scale. In this paper, the concept of this M-power cycle is applied to a 100 kWe mGT (Turbec T100) to assess its performance, using Aspen Plus® simulations. Moreover, the impact of various inputs, component performance and control parameters is studied using a sensitivity analysis. The numerical results highlight that the M-power cycle has the highest waste heat recovery and thus the highest electric efficiency (up to 147 kWe electric power output with an electric efficiency of 42.1% at constant rotational speed and 41.1%, corresponding to an 8.3%point absolute increase, at constant power output). Moreover, this cycle concept allows to approach the thermodynamic limit for cycle humidification. Indeed, a large exergy destruction is avoided by not going for direct water injection, but rather using a gradual injection and evaporation. Additionally, from a technological point of view, the M-power cycle is also preferable for the small-scale mGT. Indeed, in the M-power cycle, saturation tower, aftercooler, recuperator and economizer are combined in one single component, significantly reducing the complexity of the cycle. The main limitation is the saturator, that requires a wet bulb effectiveness of up to 98% to achieve the simulated performance, which can be technological very challenging.

Keywords: Micro Gas Turbine (mGT); Cycle humidification; Waste heat recovery; REVAP; M-power cycle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920313647
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:279:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920313647

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115898

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().