EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Thermodynamic and environmental sustainability analysis of electricity production from an integrated cogeneration system based on residual biomass: A life cycle approach

Mauro Prestipino, Fabio Salmeri, Filippo Cucinotta and Antonio Galvagno

Applied Energy, 2021, vol. 295, issue C, No S0306261921005122

Abstract: This study analyses the sustainability of a bioenergy system fed by residual biomass with high moisture content (citrus peel), which is designed in cogeneration mode and integrated with the factory generating the residue. The impacts of electricity production are comprehensively assessed by conducting thermodynamic and environmental analyses with a life cycle approach. Two scenarios were analyzed considering the differences in the process layouts between juice factories. The first scenario with wet feedstock (Scenario W) includes the drying process in the bioenergy plant's boundaries. A second scenario uses dry feedstock (Scenario D), and the drying process is considered outside the boundaries. The thermodynamic performances are assessed by life cycle energy/exergy efficiencies, the cumulative exergy demand of non-renewable resources (CExDnr), and energy/exergy return on investment. Additionally, a new renewability indicator is introduced, hereby named Integrated Renewability (IR), to consider the origin (renewable or non-renewable) of the resources substituted by the side products. The Life Cycle Assessment shows that the scrubbing process, fed with bio-oil, could undermine the system’s sustainability. The overall exergy efficiency was determined to be 0.29 and 0.24 for Scenario D and Scenario W, respectively. Compared to the electricity from the national grid (Italy), the integrated bioenergy system leads to lower life cycle exergy efficiencies in both scenarios (0.24 and 0.20 for Scenario D and Scenario W, respectively, Vs. 0.34 for national grid), higher IR (3.1 and 1.5 Vs. −0.9), lower CExDnr (0.32 and 0.33 vs. 1.9 MWh/MWhe), and lower climate change impacts (−332 and 1.29 vs. 447 kgCO2/MWhe).

Keywords: Life cycle assessment; Cumulative exergy demand; Renewability; Bioenergy; Gasification; Citrus peel (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921005122
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:295:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921005122

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117054

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:295:y:2021:i:c:s0306261921005122