EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Elevating the acceptable cost threshold for solid oxide cells: A case study on refinery decarbonization

Yingtian Chi, Jin Lin, Peiyang Li, Zhipeng Yu, Shujun Mu, Xi Li and Yonghua Song

Applied Energy, 2024, vol. 373, issue C, No S0306261924012121

Abstract: Solid oxide cells (SOCs) have multiple advantages, including high efficiency and reversibility, but they are still characterized by low maturity and high investment costs. Their cost-effectiveness remains to be evaluated from an investment viewpoint for their ability to compete with mature and low-cost alkaline electrolysis (ALK). To this end, this study considers the application of SOC in the production of green hydrogen and electricity to decarbonize a refinery plant, a potential application scenario favoring the efficient SOC technology due to its requirement for stable operation and lack of inexpensive renewable electricity. A planning model is proposed to optimize the system configuration and minimize the system cost, based on which the acceptable cost threshold enabling SOC to compete with ALK is determined, defined as the unit investment cost of SOC at which substituting ALK with SOC will not increase the system cost. The results show that the high efficiency of SOC reduces the investment in renewable generation to fulfill the hydrogen demand, and its reversibility eliminates additional hydrogen-to-electricity and ammonia-to-electricity investments to realize long-duration energy storage. These factors enable SOC to compete with ALK at an investment cost of 11.6 CNY/W, three times the investment cost of ALK. Moreover, when SOC and ALK are combined, SOC can operate at a capacity factor above 75%, 1.5 times the capacity factor of ALK. This further boosts the threshold to 20.4 CNY/W, revealing that SOC and ALK, instead of competing, can work together to lower the system cost and drive commercialization of the emerging SOC technology.

Keywords: Solid oxide cell; Acceptable cost threshold; Cost effectiveness; Refinery decarbonization; Long-duration energy storage; Ammonia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924012121
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:373:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924012121

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123829

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu (repec@elsevier.com).

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:373:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924012121