EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Compressed air energy storage system with an ejector integrated in energy-release stage: Where is the optimal location of constant-pressure operation?

Shaowei Qing, Shangkun Ren, Yan Wang, Xiankui Wen, Jingliang Zhong, Shengli Tang and E. Peng

Applied Energy, 2024, vol. 375, issue C, No S030626192401523X

Abstract: As one of promising large-scale energy storage technologies, compressed air energy storage (CAES) system can release stable power by expanders in constant-pressure operation (CPO) mode. An ejector integrated in the valvetrain of energy-release stage has shown a certain potential for improving CAES system efficiency by recovering part of throttling loss. In such an ejector-integrated CAES system, different CPO locations may significantly influence total energy-release work by changing the inlet air flow rate of expanders. However, the issue of optimal CPO location for maximizing total energy-release work has been overlooked so far. Then, to demonstrate the optimal CPO location, the thermodynamic model of a 10 MW thermal-storage CAES system with or without the ejector is established, in which different low-pressure air sources (namely different suction positions of the ejector), motive air pressures, and CPO locations are considered, and the maximum entrainment ratio of the ejector is self-consistently calculated by a one-dimensional semi-empirical model. The results show that different CPO locations have negligible influence on the maximum entrainment ratio of the ejector, the optimal low-pressure air source, and the total amount of entrained low-pressure air, but change the total energy-release work, round-trip efficiency and profit significantly. For example, the total energy-release work, the rise amplitude of round-trip efficiency, and the profit of the ejector corresponding to the CPO location, namely the inlet of the second expander, can be respectively 4.72 × 109 J, 4.38% and 128$ bigger than those corresponding to the CPO location, namely the inlet of the first expander. As a result, the optimal CPO location is the inlet of the second expander. This paper provides a new optimal operating rule, namely the optimal CPO location, for the CAES system integrated with ejector technology.

Keywords: Compressed air energy storage system; Ejector; Constant-pressure operation location; Working parameters; Performance analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192401523X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:375:y:2024:i:c:s030626192401523x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124140

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:375:y:2024:i:c:s030626192401523x