 Elicitation of risk preferences through satisficingKavitha Ranganathan and Tomás Lejarraga Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2021, vol. 32, issue C Abstract: Financial institutions across the globe are now required to measure how much risk their clients are willing to accept. Despite its importance, there is no consensus on how to assess risk attitudes in providing adequate and legally compliant financial services. The standard approaches have been challenged. Recently, financial regulators have begun to focus on the worst possible scenario: Retail investors should be inquired about how much loss they are willing and able to bear. We examine the satisficing method, a recent approach that brings the worst possible scenario to the center of the risk-preference assessment. This method involves asking participants to state the minimum returns they are willing to accept given a portfolio comprising a safe and a risky prospect. The stated minimum returns are a measure of risk preference. We observe that this measure correlates well with existing measures of risk preference, has high test–retest reliability while capturing high response variation, and predicts investments in stock or mutual funds. Keywords: Risk preference; Risk attitude; Elicitation; Satisficing; Asset allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:32:y:2021:i:c:s2214635021001143 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100570 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance is currently edited by Michael Dowling and Jürgen Huber More articles in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.