 Coordination failure in experimental banks of different sizesFederico Belotti, Eloisa Campioni, Vittorio Larocca, Francesca Marazzi, Luca Panaccione and Andrea Piano Mortari Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 2024, vol. 44, issue C Abstract: We run a laboratory experiment to investigate how group size affects coordination in a bank-run game, in which participants choose simultaneously whether to withdraw or not and group members change over time. We find that bank size significantly affects the individual withdrawal probability, which is on average 12% higher in large than in small banks. In the initial round(s), all groups exhibit a similar withdrawal rate of about 40%; then, large and medium banks converge to the bank-run equilibrium, while small banks exhibit no systematic convergence. In all banks, experience and beliefs significantly affect the probability to withdraw and to experiment, i.e., to take in the current round the decision opposite to what was the best response in the previous one. We show that experimentation is a strategic choice, and interpret it as an attempt at promoting group convergence towards the efficient equilibrium. Keywords: Coordination game; Laboratory experiment; Bank run (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:beexfi:v:44:y:2024:i:c:s2214635024001151 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbef.2024.101000 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance is currently edited by Michael Dowling and Jürgen Huber More articles in Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.