Novel payoff calculation resolves social dilemmas in networks
Zhen Han,
Peican Zhu and
Juan Shi
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2023, vol. 166, issue C
Abstract:
Standing in others’ shoes is usually describing the phenomenon that individuals switch their position and think about others’ benefits. This common saying can also stimulate the cooperation behavior, no matter in natural system or human society. In fact, Scholars have conducted abundant of researches to explore human behaviors in evolutionary game theory to discover how to improve cooperation among individualist. Results clearly showed that players can achieve the highest payoff when they choose cooperation strategy. However, selfishness among individuals results in that cooperation is not guaranteed every time, and how to improve cooperative behavior still remains a challenge in literature. Nevertheless, we analyzed the notion of “Standing in others’ shoes” through mathematical method, and analyzed this idea by introducing evolutionary game theory. The results indicate that the cooperation can be promoted significantly when players take opponents’ payoff into account. Here, a parameter of u was introduced into the simulation process representing when different strategies are applied by the focal player x and its neighbor, the focal player x will calculate its own payoff at possibilities u, and with the possibilities of 1−u considering its neighbor yi’s payoff. The Monte Carlo simulation is conducted on spatial-lattice network, BA scale-free network and small-world network respectively. The results reveal that the frequency of cooperation can be improved dramatically when parameter u reached a certain threshold.
Keywords: Evolutionary game theory; Spatial multi-games; BA scale-free network (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077922010736
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:166:y:2023:i:c:s0960077922010736
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112894
Access Statistics for this article
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals is currently edited by Stefano Boccaletti and Stelios Bekiros
More articles in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thayer, Thomas R. ().