No such thing as the perfect match: Bayesian Model Averaging for treatment evaluation

Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti, Luca Pedini and Claudia Pigini

Economic Modelling, 2022, vol. 107, issue C

Abstract: Propensity Score Matching is a popular approach to evaluate treatment effects in observational studies. Regrettably, practitioners often overlook the issue of model uncertainty and its consequences when building the propensity score model. We tackle this problem by Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) with an application to the 2014 Italian tax credit reform (the so-called “Renzi bonus”). Model uncertainty has a dramatic impact on the estimated treatment effects: using standard model selection procedures may lead to choosing equally defensible models that, however, produce substantially heterogeneous results. By using BMA-based estimates, we find a much more coherent picture: significant effect of the rebate on food consumption only for liquidity constrained households, in line with most recent literature.

Keywords: 2014 Italian tax credit reform; Bayesian model averaging; Model uncertainty; Propensity score matching; Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo; Tax rebate policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999321003187
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecmode:v:107:y:2022:i:c:s0264999321003187

DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105729

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Modelling is currently edited by S. Hall and P. Pauly

More articles in Economic Modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().