Cost-effective land-use options of drained peatlands– integrated biophysical-economic modeling approach
Artti Juutinen,
Anne Tolvanen,
Miia Saarimaa,
Paavo Ojanen,
Sakari Sarkkola,
Anssi Ahtikoski,
Soili Haikarainen,
Jouni Karhu,
Arto Haara,
Mika Nieminen,
Timo Penttilä,
Hannu Nousiainen,
Juha-Pekka Hotanen,
Kari Minkkinen,
Mikko Kurttila,
Kaisa Heikkinen,
Tapani Sallantaus,
Kaisu Aapala and
Seppo Tuominen
Ecological Economics, 2020, vol. 175, issue C
Abstract:
Peatlands provide habitats for many species and a variety of ecosystem services worldwide. In this study we used an integrated biophysical-economic modeling approach with multi-objective optimization to investigate how alternative land-use and land-management (LULM) options jointly affect economic returns from marketed (timber, energy peat, restoration costs) and non-marketed public goods (water quality, GHG emissions, biodiversity) in a typical landscape dominated by peatlands in northern Finland. We considered several LULM options including no action (the current state will continue), bioenergy wood harvesting, intensive forest management, restoration, and energy peat extraction with three after use options (no after use, reforestation, rewetting). Our study revealed strong tradeoffs between biodiversity and ecosystem services in drained peatlands. Optimal LULM depended strongly on the chosen objectives, i.e. whether marketed or non-marketed goods were preferred. For example, when the objective was carbon neutral land-use, the no action option was mostly chosen, while bioenergy wood harvesting was mostly chosen when the objective was to provide economic and environmental benefits at the same time. The strong tradeoff between biodiversity and ecosystem services indicates that compromises are unavoidable in order to obtain a multi-functional landscape which provides biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation and water protection in a cost-effective manner.
Keywords: Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; GHG emissions; Multi-objective optimization; Peatlands; Water quality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800919317112
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:175:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919317112
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106704
Access Statistics for this article
Ecological Economics is currently edited by C. J. Cleveland
More articles in Ecological Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().