An observation regarding Hamilton’s recent criticisms of Kilian’s global real economic activity index

Nima Nonejad

Economics Letters, 2020, vol. 196, issue C

Abstract: Hamilton (2019) offers several criticisms of the global real economic activity (REA) index suggested in Kilian (2009). This study deals with Hamilton (2019)’s arguments regarding the ability of the index to forecast commodity prices. Using in-sample population-level predictability tests, Hamilton (2019) argues that world industrial production index growth rate performs better than Kilian’s REA Index. We show that from an out-of-sample population-level predictability perspective, the REA index performs just as well if not better than world industrial production index. The Clark and West (2007) no population-level predictability null hypothesis is rejected at the same rate if not higher for the REA index, especially as the forecast horizon increases.

Keywords: Commodity prices; Global economic activity; Out-of-sample forecast evaluation; Population-level predictability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C22 C53 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176520303517
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0165176520303517

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109582

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().