Retaliation in Bitcoin networks

Laura Lepomäki, Juho Kanniainen and Henri Hansen

Economics Letters, 2021, vol. 203, issue C

Abstract: Due to counterparty risks, some Bitcoin trading platforms allow users to rate the level of trust they have in others. We examine users’ feedback behavior on two Bitcoin trading platforms and provide statistically strong evidence that the feedback behavior of Bitcoin users is dependent on how they are rated themselves, that is, they retaliate. In addition, user’s reputation is strongly and positively associated with the scores they deliver, and there is a certain persistence in the scores a user gives to others. We find that peers deliver negative feedback relatively quickly to users with bad reputation. Moreover, well-reputed users withhold negative feedback longer and give positive feedback faster than users with bad reputation.

Keywords: Bitcoin; Peer-review networks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A1 G1 G2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176521000999
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:203:y:2021:i:c:s0165176521000999

DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109822

Access Statistics for this article

Economics Letters is currently edited by Economics Letters Editorial Office

More articles in Economics Letters from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().