 Aggregation may or may not eliminate reproductive uncertaintyDmitrii O. Logofet Ecological Modelling, 2017, vol. 363, issue C, 187-191 Abstract: In matrix population models, there cannot be any ‘reproductive uncertainty’ when the life cycle graph contains only one reproductive stage. Otherwise, it is logical to expect that aggregating all the reproductive stages into a single one would exclude the very basis of uncertainty. However, can the aggregation change principally the model characteristics such as the dominant eigenvalue λ1 of the projection matrix, thus signifying the aggregation failure? I demonstrate that it can with the data mined in a case study on the dynamics of a local stage-structured population of Eritrichium caucasicum, a short-lived perennial plant species inhabiting an alpine lichen heath. Frobenius Theorem for nonnegative matrices specifies the upper and lower bounds for λ1 via the row (or column) sums of matrix elements, and the lower bound, when it exceeds the maximal possible λ1 of the original, disaggregated matrix, does explain why the aggregation may fail to eliminate reproductive uncertainty. Keywords: Discrete-structured population; Life cycle graph; Matrix population model; Dominant eigenvalue; Reproductive uncertainty; Generative stages; Aggregation; Frobenius theorem (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:363:y:2017:i:c:p:187-191 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.08.004 Access Statistics for this article Ecological Modelling is currently edited by Brian D. Fath More articles in Ecological Modelling from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.