Comparing cost-effectiveness of paddy fields and seawalls for coastal protection to reduce economic damage of typhoons in China

Ruiying Geng, Xin Liu, Xin Lv, Zhiqiang Gao and Ning Xu

Ecosystem Services, 2021, vol. 47, issue C

Abstract: China suffers from typhoons frequently. The protection of the population and property of coastal areas from typhoon damage mainly relies on seawalls. As the largest artificial wetlands in China, paddy fields have been proven to provide some ecosystem services as natural wetlands do. However, the studies about whether paddy fields have the same typhoon protection function as wetlands are few. We assessed 138 typhoon events in China from 1989 to 2018 to establish three economic regression models and to demonstrate that the existence of either seawalls or paddy fields in the swath of the typhoon can reduce economic loss. In addition, we compared the typhoon protection value provided by seawalls and paddy fields, and analyzed their cost effectiveness to compare their efficiencies at mitigating the economic damage caused by typhoons. The results show that the average economic values of the protection from typhoon damage provided by seawalls and paddy fields are CNY 8.78 million/km and CNY 0.799 million/km2, respectively. Although the cost effectiveness of the typhoon protection provided by seawalls is 1.8 and that of paddy fields is 0.4, the typhoon protection value provided by paddy fields cannot be ignored despite their primary function is to provide food.

Keywords: Paddy fields; Seawalls; Economic regression model; Typhoon protection; Cost effectiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041620301741
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecoser:v:47:y:2021:i:c:s2212041620301741

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101232

Access Statistics for this article

Ecosystem Services is currently edited by Leon C Braat

More articles in Ecosystem Services from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().