Can incentive-compatibility reduce hypothetical bias in smokers’ experimental choice behavior? A randomized discrete choice experiment

John Buckell, Justin S. White and Ce Shang

Journal of choice modelling, 2020, vol. 37, issue C

Abstract: Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are used to provide evidence for policymaking and nonmarket valuation in health. A perennial issue with the stated preference data used in DCEs is hypothetical bias; that is, hypothetical responses in experiments may differ from real-world behavior. A randomized DCE tested whether an incentive-compatible preference elicitation reduced hypothetical bias. Adult smokers were randomly assigned to either an incentive-compatible arm or a control arm; and then made DCE choices among cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and an opt-out. We examined the impacts on product choices, willingness to pay, and the scale of utility. Scale and willingness to pay were unaffected by the incentive. Respondents in the incentive-compatible arm were more likely to choose e-cigarettes. That is, the incentive-compatible approach affected product choices rather than scale/attribute preferences. Thus, while it is feasible to use incentive-compatibility mechanisms to manipulate experimental behaviors, the approach did not induce the hypothesized effect on preferences in this setting.

Keywords: Discrete choice experiments; Tobacco; Hypothetical bias; Incentive-compatibility; Willingness to pay (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C35 I12 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175553452030052X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:37:y:2020:i:c:s175553452030052x

DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2020.100255

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of choice modelling is currently edited by S. Hess and J.M. Rose

More articles in Journal of choice modelling from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().