Explaining the direction of emissions embodied in trade from hypotheses based on country rankings11Funding information: Bingqian Yan received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 71903195

Erik Dietzenbacher and Bingqian Yan

Energy Economics, 2024, vol. 129, issue C

Abstract: We examine theories that take environmental aspects into account to explain exports and imports. They use a ranking of countries and the typical prediction in the case of bilateral trade is that the higher-ranked country (of the two) gains from extra trade whilst the lower-ranked country loses. Gains and losses are expressed in terms of the net emissions embodied in trade. The two best-known theories are the Pollution Haven Hypothesis (PHH) and the Factor Endowment Hypothesis (FEH). Using data for 40 countries (or regions), we have a set of 780 country-pairs. Only 32% of the predictions with PHH and 37% of the predictions with FEH turn out to be correct. Our next step is to start at the other end and ask which ranking of countries would have had the most correct predictions. It turns out that the success rate of the optimal ranking of countries is only 61%. The implication is that even the optimal ranking (or theory) performs poorly.

Keywords: International trade; Emissions embodied in trade; Pollution haven; Factor endowment; Input-output analysis; Triangularization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D57 F18 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323006862
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323006862

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107188

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().