On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones

Paul Simshauser ()

Energy Economics, 2024, vol. 129, issue C

Abstract: Scaling-up Variable Renewable Energy will face critical bottlenecks vis-a-vis requisite transmission hosting capacity. Network developments must navigate the complexity of encroaching on private land, risk disturbing sites of cultural significance, compete with other environmental (i.e. biodiversity) objectives, and endure backlash from directly affected communities. Transmission is costly and post-pandemic supply-chain constraints are sending equipment costs higher. Given time and cost risks, existing transmission networks and successful augmentations need to function at their outer operating envelope. In this article, a Renewable Energy Zone (REZ) is examined by comparing static, seaonal and real-time dynamic line ratings. Historically, seasonal line ratings in the Queensland region of Australia's National Electricity Market reflected the still, hot conditions that characterised critical event maximum demand days. Widespread take-up rates of rooftop solar PV has shifted maximum (grid-supplied) demand to the late-afternoon when wind speeds are rising, which also provides thermal cooling to transmission lines. Optimisation modelling suggests a shift from static to dynamic line ratings for a reference 275 kV radial REZ in Queensland can increase wind hosting capacity from ∼1700 MW to >2800 MW with limited change in the asset base. Dynamically adjusting Frequency Control Ancillary Services further increases VRE hosting capacity.

Keywords: Renewable energy zones; Dynamic line ratings; Frequency control ancillary services; Variable renewable energy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D52 D53 G12 L94 Q40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323007314
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: On Static vs. Dynamic Line Ratings in Renewable Energy Zones (2023)
Working Paper: On static vs. dynamic line ratings in renewable energy zones (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:129:y:2024:i:c:s0140988323007314

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107233

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().