The impact of electricity sales side reform on energy technology innovation: An analysis based on SCP paradigm

Xueqin Li, Zhuoji Zheng, Beier Luo, Daqian Shi and Xianfeng Han

Energy Economics, 2024, vol. 136, issue C

Abstract: The Electricity Sales Side Reform (ESSR) is a market-oriented reform directly targeting the electricity terminal, aimed at fostering a diversified and fully competitive market structure, particularly to encourage energy technology innovation (ETI). This study establishes a Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) framework, selects Chinese A-share listed companies from 2013 to 2019 as the research subjects, and employs the multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) method to examine the impact of ESSR on ETI. The primary findings are as follows: (1) ESSR effectively promotes ETI, indicating that changes in market structure enhance energy innovation performance. (2) ESSR stimulates long-term innovation incentives rather than short-term profit impulse, signifying that it intensifies market competition, optimizes resource allocation, and guides information disclosure, thereby supporting firms' ETI. This validates the theoretical paradigm of SCP. (3) The positive impact of ESSR on ETI exhibits heterogeneity. On the electricity generation side, the catalytic effect of ESSR on ETI is more pronounced in regions with lower traditional energy endowments and greater green electricity generation potential. On the electricity sales side, the incentive effect is more prominent in regions with higher electricity prices and a lower capacity in the electricity sales market. On the electricity consumption side, the incentive effect is stronger for enterprises with a cleaner energy structure and increased green investments. Therefore, our research findings bridge gaps in the existing literature and offer valuable insights for achieving a high level of ETI and facilitating energy structure transformation.

Keywords: Electricity sales side reform (ESSR); Energy technology innovation (ETI); Structure-conduct-performance (SCP) framework; Difference-in-differences (DID) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324004717
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:136:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324004717

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107763

Access Statistics for this article

Energy Economics is currently edited by R. S. J. Tol, Beng Ang, Lance Bachmeier, Perry Sadorsky, Ugur Soytas and J. P. Weyant

More articles in Energy Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().