Sustainability assessment of cellulosic biorefinery stillage utilization methods using emergy analysis

Nawa Raj Baral, David M. Wituszynski, Jay F. Martin and Ajay Shah

Energy, 2016, vol. 109, issue C, 13-28

Abstract: Energy can be recovered from stillage from cellulosic biorefineries in different ways, including direct combustion and fast pyrolysis. These different energy conversion routes require different level of inputs from natural resources, non-renewable resources, and economic services. Due to the high energetic and economic costs of stillage recovery methods, it is essential to perform a sustainability analysis of these different options before commercial deployment. Thus, the main objective of this study was to assess the relative sustainability and environmental impact of fast pyrolysis and direct combustion systems for the beneficial use of waste stillage using emergy analysis. The estimated emergy sustainability indices of direct combustion and fast pyrolysis were 0.09 and 0.07, respectively, where the renewable fraction of stillage was the most influential input parameter. Additionally, the net product transformity for direct combustion and fast pyrolysis were 7.06E+05 and 2.61E+05 seJ/J, respectively. Overall, a 23% higher emergy sustainability index for the direct combustion compared to the fast pyrolysis and a 63% lower overall product transformity for the fast pyrolysis compared to the direct combustion suggests that both systems, at the current state of the technology, offer differing advantages for stillage utilization depending upon the desired end products and uses.

Keywords: Cellulosic biofuels; Stillage utilization; Direct combustion; Fast pyrolysis; Emergy sustainability index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544216304984
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:109:y:2016:i:c:p:13-28

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.085

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().