A comparative assessment of Power-to-Fuel production pathways
Eleonora Bargiacchi,
Marco Antonelli and
Umberto Desideri
Energy, 2019, vol. 183, issue C, 1253-1265
Abstract:
As the share of intermittent renewable power generation is increasing, energy storage is expected to play a key role in ensuring efficiency, resilience and stability of energy systems. Besides reducing surplus energy curtailments and addressing the issue of seasonal storage, the implementation of some Power-to-X technologies could be an effective supporting tool to decarbonization policies. This paper aims at quantifying Power-to-X process efficiencies and assessing under which conditions they could be carbon neutral during the conversion phase from electricity to a chemical storage, particularly a hydrogen carrier. For this purpose, four synthetic fuel production chains were modelled and simulated with the software Aspen Plus: methane synthesis by means of the Sabatier process, methanol synthesis by carbon dioxide hydrogenation, ammonia production with the Haber-Bosch process and urea synthesis with the Stamicarbon CO2 stripping process. The production pathways were compared in terms of energy and exergy efficiencies, net CO2 emissions and specific energy consumption. Emission intensity threshold values for these technologies to be carbon neutral were also estimated. Assuming that the feed hydrogen is produced by electrolysis, the impact of an upstram electrolyzer upon the aforementioned parameters was assessed and discussed. The further processing of the produced fuels (X-to-Power) is not included in the present work.
Keywords: Electrofuels; Hydrogen; Methane; Methanol; Ammonia; Urea; Sabatier reaction; Haber-Bosch; Bosch-Meiser (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219312812
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:183:y:2019:i:c:p:1253-1265
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.149
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().