Analysis on full CO2 capture schemes in NG/O2 combustion gas and steam mixture cycle (GSMC)
Jiafeng Wu,
Yaping Chen,
Zilong Zhu and
Shuxing Zheng
Energy, 2020, vol. 191, issue C
Abstract:
The nature gas and pure oxygen (NG/O2) combustion gas and steam mixture cycle (GSMC) is a novel power generation cycle using NG/O2 combustion product and circulation H2O as the turbine working medium, which can implement efficient power generation, CO2 capture and energy shifting. In GSMC, cold energy of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and liquefied oxygen (LO2) is used for CO2 capture. The CO2 capture schemes are analyzed to improve the CO2 capture as well as the system efficiency. The main means to increase the CO2 capture and extend CO2 full capture range include the reduction of CO2 liquefaction enthalpy drop and the conservation of cooling energy consumption in CO2/moisture separation. Lower efficiency is always a penalty of the full CO2 capture especially with higher condenser outlet temperature. The optimal scheme is different under different conditions such as parameters of turbine inlet, cooling water, and CO2 liquefaction. At turbine inlet of 30MPa/1000 °C and condenser outlet of 18kPa/38 °C, the efficiency drop is 1.18% for the full CO2 capture of the improved scheme, while the CO2 capture ratio of the original GSMC scheme is less than 60%. The distinctive CO2 capture of GSMC is summarized as system indispensable, scheme optional and method promotable.
Keywords: Gas and steam mixture cycle (GSMC); Full CO2 capture; Cold energy utilization; LNG; Fuel-O2 combustion; CO2/Moisture separation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219321656
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:191:y:2020:i:c:s0360544219321656
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116470
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().