High electricity generation and COD removal from cattle wastewater in microbial fuel cells with 3D air cathode employed non-precious Cu2O/reduced graphene oxide as cathode catalyst

Shuaishuai Xin, Jianguo Shen, Guocheng Liu, Qinghua Chen, Zhou Xiao, Guodong Zhang and Yanjun Xin

Energy, 2020, vol. 196, issue C

Abstract: In this study, we synthesized a non-precious Cu2O decorated reduced graphene oxide composite (Cu2O/rGO) by a facile and direct reduction strategy and evaluated the electricity generation and COD removal performance of MFCs with Cu2O/rGO as cathode catalyst in treating cattle wastewater. The Cu2O/rGO with the mass Cu(Ac)2/GO ratio of 450:50 exhibited the highest catalytic activity by cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiment. The large surface area (363.9 m2 g−1) of Cu2O/rGO with numerous mesoporous exhibited higher exchange current density (12.38 μA cm−2) and lower War-burg impedance (21.82 Ω) comparing with Pt/C (11.99 μA cm−2, 102.10 Ω), and contributed to 4-electron ORR. Notably, the maximum output voltage, power density and coulombic efficiency of MFC with 3D air cathode employed Cu2O/rGO catalyst reached 0.165 V, 1362 mW m−2 and 54.9%, respectively, which were higher than those (0.152 V, 1166 mW m−2 and 53.5%) with 3D air cathode employed Pt/C catalyst in treating cattle wastewater. Moreover, the average COD removal rate of MFC with Cu2O/rGO catalyst reached 71.5%, which were higher than those 69.8% with Pt/C catalyst. Generally, the MFC with 3D air cathode employed non-precious Cu2O/rGO catalyst instead of Pt/C catalysts is a promising method for simultaneous electricity generation and cattle wastewater treatment.

Keywords: Cuprous oxide nanoparticles; Cattle wastewater; Microbial fuel cells; Oxygen reduction reaction; Reduce graphene oxide (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220302309
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:196:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220302309

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117123

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().