Multi-objective optimization of organic Rankine cycle using hydrofluorolefins (HFOs) based on different target preferences
Shuozhuo Hu,
Jian Li,
Fubin Yang,
Zhen Yang and
Yuanyuan Duan
Energy, 2020, vol. 203, issue C
Abstract:
Thermodynamic and economic performance are common conflicting indicators to evaluate the organic Rankine cycle (ORC). Different preferences between thermodynamic and economic criteria lead to different results. In this study, a numerical target preference based ORC model using multi-objective optimization and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is proposed, which provides corresponding optimal system parameters and working fluid according to decision-makers’ different preferences. Four MCDM methods are used to select optimal solutions in 51 preference cases with the weight of economic performance (W1) increasing from 0 to 1. As an example, a subcritical ORC using seven eco-friendly hydrofluorolefin fluids is analyzed. Results reveal the great influence of target preference on optimal solutions. In terms of system parameters, evaporation temperature is the most relevant decision variable, which should be reduced as W1 increases. While the superheat degree should be kept minimum value, regardless of target preference. For working fluid, when thermodynamic performance is dominating (W1<0.2), R1234ze(E) is optimal with the largest power output of 50.8 kW, 14% higher than R245fa. Otherwise (W1≥0.3), R1234ze(Z) is optimal. Besides, four MCDM methods are compared, and LINMAP is recommended. The method proposed in this study provides decision-makers with more flexible options and more reliable results.
Keywords: Organic Rankine cycle (ORC); Hydrofluorolefins (HFOs); Multi-objective optimization; Economic assessment; Target preference (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220309555
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:203:y:2020:i:c:s0360544220309555
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117848
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().