Systematic evaluation of efficiency improvement options for sCO2 Brayton cycles

Mathias Penkuhn and George Tsatsaronis

Energy, 2020, vol. 210, issue C

Abstract: Supercritical CO2 (sCO2) based power cycles have gained an increased attention because of their potential to offer a higher cycle efficiency combined with improved process economics and operational flexibility. The potential for further development and commercialization is determined by the right balance between cycle efficiency, design complexity, and economics. The present study analyzes different pathways to improve the design of generic sCO2 Brayton cycles for power generation based on a structured pattern known from conventional water-steam cycles. Starting from a simple cycle design, different options such as preheating, intercooled compression, reheating, and split-compression are investigated. The application of an exergy analysis for each design provides the possibility to identify the location and magnitude of thermodynamic inefficiencies for each design option. With the use of a complexity metric, the offset between efficiency improvement and increase in system size and complexity can be quantified in the absence of appropriate economic data. The results show the inherent trade-off between the increase in efficiency and complexity with the best cycle improvement options being preheating by recuperation, split-compression, and intercooled compression. In principle, the suggested complexity metric approach is useful when evaluating similar systems and provides tangible results for subsequent, more detailed studies.

Keywords: Supercritical CO2 cycles; Process design evaluation; Exergy analysis; Complexity analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422031584X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:210:y:2020:i:c:s036054422031584x

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118476

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().