A comparative life cycle assessment of clean aviation fuels

O. Siddiqui and I. Dincer

Energy, 2021, vol. 234, issue C

Abstract: In this study, life cycle assessments and comparative evaluations are performed for different types of renewable and alternative fuels for aircrafts. The life cycle impacts of both hydrogen and ammonia fuels are primarily investigated considering conventional and renewable energy-based routes. The overall life cycle impacts of several hydrocarbon fuels including kerosene, ethanol, methanol, dimethyl ether, and biodiesel are also studied. The steam methane reforming-based route for hydrogen and ammonia fuels is found to have higher global warming potentials as compared to alternative production routes. High phosphate emissions result in a higher freshwater eutrophication potential for the solar-based route for ammonia fuel. Fossil fuel-based dimethyl ether is found to have a comparatively higher global warming potential of 1.3 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km amongst the considered hydrocarbon fuels that include ethanol (1.1 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km), kerosene (1.04 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km), methanol (1.01 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km), and biodiesel (1.07 kgCO2 equivalent per tonne-km). Dimethyl ether is found to entail high toxicity potentials and the reduction of life cycle arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, and lead emissions is recommended. However, higher photochemical ozone formation potentials of 0.0055 and 0.0046 kgNOx equivalent per tonne-km are associated with biodiesel and kerosene fuels respectively.

Keywords: Clean fuels; Hydrogen; Ammonia; Sustainable aviation; Life cycle assessment; Efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221013748
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:234:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221013748

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121126

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().