EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Thermo-economic and environmental assessment of hybrid vapor compression-absorption refrigeration systems for district cooling

Sambhaji T. Kadam, Alexios-Spyridon Kyriakides, Muhammad Saad Khan, Mohammad Shehabi, Athanasios I. Papadopoulos, Ibrahim Hassan, Mohammad Azizur Rahman and Panos Seferlis

Energy, 2022, vol. 243, issue C

Abstract: District cooling plants are predominantly based on vapor compression refrigeration cycles with detrimental environmental impacts due to fossil-based electricity. Vapor absorption refrigeration cycles promise operating improvements and emission reductions in vapor compression-absorption refrigeration system configurations. However, the use of conventional vapor absorption refrigeration working fluids and the limited studies of systems with capacities that are relevant to district cooling plants, prohibit their scaling-up. This work compares the thermodynamic, environmental, and economic performance of seven configurations of the vapor compression refrigeration cycle with a double-effect vapor absorption refrigeration cycle that employs either the conventional ammonia/water or the novel acetaldehyde-N,N-dimethylformamide working fluid. These three cycles are compared with the cascade and parallel vapor compression-absorption refrigeration system configurations, with ammonia/water or acetaldehyde-N,N-dimethylformamide in the vapor absorption refrigeration. The coefficient of performance of the vapor compression refrigeration unit in the cascade configurations is 252% higher than the stand-alone vapor compression refrigeration configuration. The stand-alone vapor absorption refrigeration coefficient of performance with the novel fluid acetaldehyde-N,N-dimethylformamide is 9.1% higher than that of the vapor absorption refrigeration with ammonia/water. The cost per ton of cooling and the total equivalent warming potential of the cascade vapor compression-absorption refrigeration system with acetaldehyde-N,N-dimethylformamide are 65% and 67.8% lower than those of the stand-alone vapor compression refrigeration. The electrical energy utilization factor is 30.5% lower for the acetaldehyde-N,N-dimethylformamide fluid compared to ammonia/water, in the cascade configuration.

Keywords: VCR-VAR configuration; Vapor absorption refrigeration; District cooling; Working fluids (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221032400
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:243:y:2022:i:c:s0360544221032400

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122991

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:243:y:2022:i:c:s0360544221032400