Can market segmentation lead to green paradox? Evidence from China

Aolin Lai, Qunwei Wang and Lianbiao Cui

Energy, 2022, vol. 254, issue PC

Abstract: China has announced its commitment to peak carbon emissions before 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2060. However, market segmentation may hinder these achievements because it creates carbon leakage among provinces. This study empirically examines the impact of market segmentation on the effectiveness of environmental regulations based on a dynamic spatial panel approach using data for 30 Chinese provinces from 2004 to 2018. Our results showed that pure environmental regulation can significantly curb carbon emissions; however, under the influence of market segmentation, carbon emissions reduced in the region are released into the neighboring provinces through the carbon leakage pathway, while the total carbon emissions raised, leading to the “green paradox”. The study also showed that the “green paradox” effect of market segmentation is more pronounced for provinces with a higher share of secondary industries, suggesting industrial transfer as the primary pathway of carbon leakage between provinces in China. Therefore, to effectively avoid the green paradox phenomenon, it is necessary to continuously promote market unification, optimize the industrial structure, and establish a unified carbon reduction system. This study clarified the relationship between market segmentation and the green paradox, thereby providing insights for China to achieve its carbon emission reduction and carbon neutrality goals.

Keywords: Green paradox; Market segmentation; Environmental regulation; Carbon neutrality; Dynamic space panel (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222012932
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:254:y:2022:i:pc:s0360544222012932

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124390

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().