Biogas potential of cup plant and willow-leaf sunflower biomass
Mariusz J. Stolarski,
Dumitru Peni and
Marcin Dębowski
Energy, 2022, vol. 255, issue C
Abstract:
Perennial herbaceous crops (PHC) are increasingly often perceived as a competitive biomass source or as a co-substrate for biogas plants. The aim of the study was to determine the dry biomass yield, the biogas and methane production efficiency, potential energy yield and economic analysis for two PHC species, depending on the fertilisation type and nitrogen level in three successive cultivation years. The mean dry matter yield of Silphium perfoliatum was significantly higher (by 19.4%) compared to the mean yield of Helianthus salicifolius. The application of organic (digestate) and mineral fertilisers and a higher nitrogen level have significantly contributed to increasing dry matter yield compared to the plots without fertilisation. However, fertilisation have no significant impact on the biogas or methane efficiency. The highest biogas efficiency for S. perfoliatum and H. salicifolius biomass was 372.8 m3 Mg−1 DM and 280.9 m3 Mg−1 DM, respectively. The biogas, methane and energy potential yield of S. perfoliatum was significantly higher (over 50%) compared to the values of H. salicifolius. Meanwhile, the potential income from energy generation from S. perfoliatum was higher by 482%. Therefore, S. perfoliatum proved to be a more prospective PHC species as a biomass source for biogas plants.
Keywords: Helianthus salicifolius; Silphium perfoliatum; Biomass yield; Biogas efficiency; Biomethane; Potential energy yield (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222014621
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:255:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222014621
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124559
Access Statistics for this article
Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser
More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().