Energy and economic performance comparison of heat pump and power cycle in low grade waste heat recovery

Zhimin Tan, Xiao Feng, Minbo Yang and Yufei Wang

Energy, 2022, vol. 260, issue C

Abstract: For the sake of making an appropriate choice for the reuse of low grade waste heat, the mechanical heat pump, steam turbine (ST), and organic Rankine cycle (ORC) are modeled by Aspen Plus. The working conditions of 100–150 °C waste heat temperatures, as well as 10–30 °C heat pump temperature lifts are simulated and calculated. The price ratio of electricity to heat is introduced as an important economic variable. The energy and economic performance of the three technologies in low grade waste heat recovery are compared and analyzed based on the exergy efficiency and annual revenue. The results indicate that in terms of the exergy efficiency, the mechanical heat pump is always the best choice. From the perspective of the annual revenue, the mechanical heat pump is the best choice in most cases. The chance that the annual revenue of the ORC and ST is greater than that of the mechanical heat pump arises only when the price ratio of electricity to heat is greater than 5. As for the payback period, all the cycles can meet the requirements of enterprises. A guide of the selection of waste heat recovery technology based on economics is drawn.

Keywords: Waste heat recovery; Mechanical heat pump; Organic rankine cycle; Steam turbine; Annual revenue; Exergy efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544222020436
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:260:y:2022:i:c:s0360544222020436

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125149

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().