Waste to fuel: Pyrolysis of waste transformer oil and its evaluation as alternative fuel along with different nanoparticles in CI engine with exhaust gas recirculation

Thanikodi Sathish, Raviteja Surakasi, Lakshmana KishoreT, Saravanan Rathinasamy, Ümit Ağbulut, Saboor Shaik, Sung Goon Park and Asif Afzal

Energy, 2023, vol. 267, issue C

Abstract: The present research aims to produce the alternative fuel from waste electric transformer oil through two levels pyrolysis process with potassium hydroxide catalyst, enhance it by 150 ppm of 30–50 nm sized Zinc oxide and Cerium oxide nanoparticles and then tested with/without EGR method to achieve low exhaust emissions. The experiments were performed on a single-cylinder, four-stroke CI engine at varying engine loads from 0 to 100% with an increment of 25% at a fixed engine speed of 1500 rpm. The results obtained from the combined test fuels have been compared with reference (conventional) diesel fuel. The performance of fuels like Diesel, PBWTO, PBWTO/ZnO, PBWTO/CeO2, and with working conditions like PBWTO/ZnO +20% EGR and PBWTO/CeO2 +20% EGR were recorded respectively at full load conditions in which HC emission as 11, 19, 14, 13, 15 and 15 ppm, 32.9%, smoke opacity as 32.9%, 39.5%, 16.6%, 19.3%, 20.1%. WTO addition into diesel fuel increased the CO emission; however, it is reduced with the nanoparticle addition. That is, PBWTO/ZnO, PBWTO/CeO2, PBWTO/ZnO +20% EGR and PBWTO/CeO2 +20% EGR have produced 0.058%, 0.046%, 0.056%, and 0.043% of lesser CO emission than PBWTO fuel respectively. In particular, EGR ensured noteworthy NOx emissions. For example, D, PBWTO, PBWTO/ZnO, PBWTO/CeO2, PBWTO/ZnO +20% EGR and PBWTO/CeO2 +20% EGR have emitted 1248 ppm, 1427 ppm, 1484 ppm, 1156 ppm, 831 ppm and 821 ppm of NOx emission, respectively. Due to the lower calorific value, higher viscosity, and poor atomization of WTO-added test fuels, the engine performance worsened. Accordingly, under full load condition, BTE was found to be 30.12%, 27.35%, 25.44%, 26.04%, 24.67%, and 25.26%, and BSFC was calculated to be 342, 410, 456, 450, 470, and 459 g/kWh for D, PBWTO, PBWTO/ZnO, PBWTO/CeO2, PBWTO/ZnO +20% EGR and PBWTO/CeO2 +20% EGR, respectively. In the conclusion, it is well-noticed that waste transformer oil can be used as a fuel substitute in CI engines with no modification on the vehicular system, and the addition of nanoparticles is a very good solution to mitigate the high exhaust pollutants arising from the use of WTO substitutes.

Keywords: Waste to energy; Transformer oil; Biodiesel; Nanofuel; Exhaust gas recirculation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422203482X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:267:y:2023:i:c:s036054422203482x

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126595

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().