 The equity-oil hedge: A comparison between volatility and alternative risk frameworksWei Kuang Energy, 2023, vol. 271, issue C Abstract: This paper investigates alternatives to the conventional minimum-variance framework for hedging equity risks with crude oil. Specifically, the optimal hedge ratios are calculated for various risk objectives such as volatility, semivariance, and tail risk. The hedging efficacy is assessed for BRIC stocks and aggregated market indices. The results show that the optimal hedge ratios differ by strategy, and hedging efficacy varies across risk metrics, equity indices, and time periods. Semivariance and tail risk hedging are more effective than volatility risk hedging, but more expensive. Oil exporters (Brazil and Russia) outperform importers (India and China) in terms of hedging effectiveness. Hedging costs are lower during COVID-19 than during the global financial crisis. It is critical to capture volatility dynamics for hedging volatility, downside, and tail risk. Over-hedging could significantly increase the risk of an equity-oil-hedged portfolio. The findings contribute to a better understanding of oil’s risk hedging capacity for equity indices, which will be of interest to financial market participants, corporations, and regulators. Keywords: Minimum-variance; Minimum-downside deviation; Minimum-CVaR; Hedging effectiveness; Equity oil hedge (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:271:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223004395 DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127045 Access Statistics for this article Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser More articles in Energy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.