Waste to wheels: Performance comparison between pressure swing adsorption and amine-absorption technologies for upgrading biogas containing hydrogen sulfide to fuel grade standards

Ammar Ali Abd, Mohd Roslee Othman, Zuchra Helwani and Jinsoo Kim

Energy, 2023, vol. 272, issue C

Abstract: Amine-absorption and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) technologies have been regarded as attractive methods to upgrade biogas by separating acid gases such as CO2 and H2S from its main component, CH4. This paper compares the separation performance and energy consumption by pressure swing adsorption and amine-absorption processes in upgrading biogas containing 39.9% CO2, 0.1% H2S, and 60% CH4. PSA and amine-absorption processes were emulated using Aspen Adsorption and Aspen Hysys platforms and validated from experimental data. The results reveal that amine-absorption technology was favorable in terms of purity and recovery of products in both streams. The optimum points of the process with desirability of 99.9% were at 0.1% H2S content, 30% CO2 content, 1% piperazine concentration, and 50% MDEA concentration with biomethane purity (99.64%) and recovery (94.84%) in the product stream, and acid gases purity (94.84%) and recovery (99.97%) in the waste stream. In term of energy consumption, however, the pressure swing adsorption process recorded a lower energy requirement of 0.178 kW/molCH4 at comparable biomethane purity of 96.2% and lower methane recovery of 80% with subsequently lower acid gases purity (85.5%) and recovery (86.7%).

Keywords: Biogas upgrading; Pressure swing adsorption; Amine absorption; Piperazine/MDEA; CO2 separation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223004541
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:272:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223004541

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127060

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().