Numerical analysis of performance, combustion, and emission characteristics of PFI gasoline, PFI CNG, and DI CNG engine

Sridhar Sahoo and Dhananjay Kumar Srivastava

Energy, 2023, vol. 278, issue C

Abstract: Compressed natural gas (CNG) has gained widespread acceptance in the automobile industry due to its clean-burning properties, lower emissions, and superior anti-knock properties. Typically, CNG is used in bi-fuel mode, where it partially replaces gasoline in a conventional gasoline engine. However, because of its gaseous nature, CNG displaces intake air, which reduces the engine's overall power output. One possible solution is to directly inject CNG into the cylinder during the late intake stroke or at the beginning of the compression stroke, which increases the engine's volumetric efficiency and power output. In a previous study, we examined the impact of injection timing on the performance of direct injection (DI) CNG engines under various engine load and speed conditions. However, the intrinsic combustion process, such as flame speed and flame front propagation, could not be investigated. In this study, we attempted to understand DI CNG engines' in-cylinder flame speed and propagation behavior. We developed a combustion model for the DI CNG engine using computational fluid dynamics. We used methane as the surrogate fuel and six cylindrical nozzles with inlet velocity boundary conditions for CNG direct injection. We studied the CNG combustion process and flame speed propagation using a validated chemical mechanism and a look-up table. We made comparisons to evaluate the numerical model against experimental reference data. We also conducted a comparative simulation of DI CNG, port fuel injection (PFI) CNG, and gasoline engines to assess combustion behavior. The combustion duration was longer for the PFI CNG engine than the gasoline engine, but it was reduced for the DI CNG engine. This was due to the DI CNG engine's 40% higher turbulent flame speed than the PFI CNG engine. The combustion of the air-fuel charge was completed within 40° CA after spark ignition. As a result, DI CNG requires a retard in ignition timing. The DI CNG engine showed a 7% higher power output with a 10% increase in volumetric efficiency compared to the PFI CNG engine. However, the power output was still lower than that of the PFI gasoline engine. The DI CNG engine emitted lower NOx and CO emissions than the PFI CNG engine. This study demonstrates the higher turbulent flame speed and rapid flame front propagation characteristics of DI CNG engines over PFI CNG engines, increasing engine efficiency.

Keywords: Port fuel injection; Gasoline; Compressed natural gas; Direct injection; Combustion; Flame speed (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422301143X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:c:s036054422301143x

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127749

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().