EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Simulation and technical, economic, and environmental analyses of natural gas liquefaction cycle using different configurations

Wang Jinxi, Bai Xue, Liang Ying, Wang Aimin, Lu Cuiying, Ma Yajun, Chen Chengmeng and Dariush Heydarian

Energy, 2023, vol. 278, issue C

Abstract: This paper aims to improve the performance of the simple C3MR natural gas liquefaction cycle from the thermodynamic, economic, and environmental aspects. Four processes are proposed where the first system uses heat recovery with the ORC cycle and boil-off gas cooling, and the second proposed plant uses the first plant with a distillation tower added for the separation of ethane plus and simultaneous production of NGL/LNG. The third scenario adds a Proton Exchange Membrane, gas turbine cycle, steam turbine, and electrolyzer to the second scenario. And the fourth scenario is in which a Rankine ammonia cycle is added to the structure of the second scenario to recover more wasted heat. Regarding exergy analysis, the third scenario represents 64.32% exergetic efficiency, while the base, 1st, 2nd, and 4th scenarios have 35.4, 47.35, 12.64%, and 17.1% exergetic efficiency, respectively. The LNG production requires 260.76, 941, 469, and 893 kWh/ tonLNG energy for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th scenarios. According to the economic analysis, the first scenario with 0.0034 $/kg total cost rate of products has the best economic performance compared to 0.0037, 0.042, 0.059 $/kg, and 0.055 total cost rate of products for the base, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th scenarios, respectively. The environmental assessment results reveal that the first scenario with 72,567 kgCO2/h has the minimum CO2 emission. The overall results indicate that the first scenario is the best, but considering the trigeneration, the third scenario is a proper system.

Keywords: Natural gas liquefaction process; Proton exchange membrane electrolyzer; Boil of gas cooling; Thermo-economic analysis; Tri-generation process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223011738
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223011738

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127779

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:278:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223011738