Techno-economic feasibility of fluid catalytic cracking unit integrated chemical looping combustion – A novel approach for CO2 capture

Fatih Güleç, Jude A. Okolie and Ahmet Erdogan

Energy, 2023, vol. 284, issue C

Abstract: Oil refineries are collectively responsible for about 4–6% of the global CO2 emissions, largely because of the regenerator part of the Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) unit (25–35%). An advanced combustion technology, also called chemical looping combustion (CLC), has been recently presented as a novel CO2 capture process for FCC units; however, no study provides the economic feasibility of a CLC-FCC unit. In this study, a techno-economic feasibility of the novel CLC-FCC unit was presented for the first time based on a case study with 50,000 barrels feed per day. A rigorous mass and energy balance estimation shows that 96 vol% of coke regeneration (combustion) was achieved in the FCC regenerator by using a stoichiometrically required amount of metal oxide (CuO modified catalysts) at 750 °C for 45 min. The preliminary energy penalty calculations of the proposed CLC-FCC unit (0.21 GJ/ton CO2) is relatively lower compared to the post-combustion (3.1–4.2 GJ/t CO2) via amine solvent and oxy-fuel combustion (1.8–2.5 GJ/t CO2) units reported in the literature. The equipment purchase cost (EPC) is 1.1 times higher than a standalone FCC unit due to the increase in the number of processing equipment required. The cash flow analysis results reveal a yearly basis average CO2 capture cost of 0.0106 US$/kg of CO2 (∼10.6 US$/ton CO2) for the CLC-FCC unit, which is lower compared to the other conventional CCS technologies i.e. oxy-fuel combustion and post-combustion. Factors such as EPC, capital expenditure (CAPEX), and discount rate significantly influenced the capture cost. In contrast, the CO2 capture cost is not influenced by a change in oxygen carrier and electricity cost.

Keywords: Techno-economic analysis; Fluid catalytic cracking; CO2 capture; Advanced combustion; Chemical looping combustion; CLC-FCC (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223020571
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:284:y:2023:i:c:s0360544223020571

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128663

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().