EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Investigation of the geothermal flash cycle developed by a thermoelectric generator and PEMFC: 3E analysis and optimization

Hooman Abdi Chaghakaboodi and Shoaib Khanmohammadi

Energy, 2024, vol. 289, issue C

Abstract: Investigations have revealed that geothermal organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) have a low efficiency and high exergy destruction rate, especially in the heat exchangers network, which drastically reduces the whole system's performance. To tackle this problem, in the present research, the effects of employing thermoelectric generators (TEG) and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) on the performance of a geothermal ORC will be discussed from thermodynamic and economic points of view. In this study, three geothermal flash cycles are investigated. The first system, GFC, is a geothermal flash cycle. The second system is the GFC boosted by a TEG thermoelectric generator, which is applied instead of the condenser (GFTC). The third system is GFTC, developed using a PEMFC (GFTPC) before the evaporator. These systems are compared from energy, exergy, and economic perspectives. Parametric analysis is conducted for the system with the best performance and the effects of the evaporator temperature, evaporator quality, flash temperature, and PEMFC temperature on the system performance. Based on the results, the net power outputs of the GFTC and GFTPC are 10.21 % and 40.49 % higher than those of the GFC, respectively. GFTC and GFTPC have higher energy and exergy efficiencies and lower LCOE and payback period than GFC. In the GFTPC, a 32.86 % increase in the net power output, 20.81 % enhancement in the energy efficiency, and 0.22 % increase in the exergy efficiency are observed with an increase in the PEMFC temperature from 75 to 115 °C. Moreover, The PEMFC temperature increment reduces the LCOE and payback period of the GFTPC system. Also, the multi-objective optimization for GFTPC design with three decision variables has been done.

Keywords: Geothermal flash cycle; Proton exchange membrane fuel cell; Thermoelectric generator; Thermodynamic cycle (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544223033030
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223033030

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129909

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:289:y:2024:i:c:s0360544223033030