Thermo-economic optimization of an artificial cavern compressed air energy storage with CO2 pressure stabilizing unit

Weifeng Zhang, Jialu Ding, Suzhen Yin, Fangyuan Zhang, Yao Zhang and Zhan Liu

Energy, 2024, vol. 294, issue C

Abstract: In recent years, the attention of engineers has been increasingly attracted to the compressed air energy storage with artificial cavern as it frees the conventional system from the dependence of salt cavern, greatly reducing the limiting factors of project location. However, the current issues are how to enhance the reliability and safety of the artificial cavern due to the cyclical pressure loading and to cut down the cost of cavern construction. The present study overtures an isobaric system for doing this via designing pressure stabilizing unit utilizing the CO2 phase change process. The specific volume of saturated liquid is an order of magnitude lower than that of the saturated gas and this characteristic contributes much to reduce the cavern size. The system thermodynamics and economics are calculated numerically and the findings are discussed to identify whether the additional complexity of isobaric gas storage are worth to do. It is recommended that the air storage pressure, CO2 storage pressure and CO2 liquefaction pressure should be positioned in sequence at 6.5 MPa, 6 MPa and 9 MPa as the optimal design conditions. In this case, the system efficiency is 69.92 %, the levelized cost of storage is 0.1332 $/kWh, the dynamic payback period is 7.26 years and the investment return ratio is 1.58. Compared to the isochoric system with equivalent efficiency, the air storage pressure in proposed system is highly reduced with just 0.65 times of original value. More importantly, the constant pressure in the cavern operation process significantly upgrades its reliability and safety. The size of cavern volume is narrowed with a decline rate of 31.86 % and the system levelized cost of storage scales back with an amplitude of 0.0138 $/kWh. To be matched with, the investment return ratio is increased by 54.9 %.

Keywords: Compressed air energy storage; Artificial cavern; Isobaric operation; Gas-liquid change; Thermo-economic analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224005930
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:294:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224005930

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130821

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().