 A thermodynamic comparison between organic Rankine and Kalina cycles for waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium ReactorV. Zare and S.M.S. Mahmoudi Energy, 2015, vol. 79, issue C, 398-406 Abstract: A comparative thermodynamic analysis and optimization is presented for waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor (GT-MHR) employing organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and Kalina cycle (KC). Thermodynamic models are developed for the stand alone GT-MHR and the two proposed combined cycles and the effects on the performances of the cycles are investigated of decision variables. The cycles' performances are then optimized based on the first and second law of thermodynamics. The results showed that, employing ORC is more appropriate than KC for GT-MHR waste heat recovery. The first and second law efficiencies of the combined GT-MHR/ORC are higher than those of the combined GT-MHR/KC. In addition, the helium mass flow rate in the combined GT-MHR/ORC is significantly lower than that in the combined GT-MHR/KC. Moreover, the high-pressure level of the ORC is extremely lower than that of the KC under optimized conditions. Furthermore, the superheated vapor at the ORC turbine exit avoids droplet erosion and allows for reliable operation while the stream exiting the KC turbine is a two-phase flow. Keywords: GT-MHR; Kalina cycle; Organic Rankine cycle; Combined cycle; Exergy (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:79:y:2015:i:c:p:398-406 DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.026 Access Statistics for this article Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser More articles in Energy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.