Effect of mixing on the performance of wet steam ejectors

Kavous Ariafar, David Buttsworth, Ghassan Al-Doori and Ray Malpress

Energy, 2015, vol. 93, issue P2, 2030-2041

Abstract: Steam ejector computational simulations using a wet steam model give higher entrainment ratios and higher critical back pressures for the ejector compared with the ideal gas model. This paper identifies the origin of these differences. Simulation results show that the wet steam model predicts an entrainment ratio for the choked flow ejector operation that is 10% higher than that for the ideal gas model. The wet steam model also gives a higher critical back pressure by about 7% relative to the ideal gas model with a closer agreement to experimental data for the unchoked ejector operation. Enhanced mixing layer growth which arises due to steam condensation in the primary nozzle is identified as the main reason for higher entrainment ratio of the ejector simulations using the wet steam model. The difference in the mixing layer growth rate between ideal gas and wet steam simulations is 21%, indicating enhanced entrainment for the wet steam model. Furthermore, the mixture at the start of the diffuser is shown to have a higher pitot pressure than in the ideal gas simulations and these elevated pitot pressures allow the ejector to operate in a choked mode to a higher critical back pressure.

Keywords: Steam ejector; Entrainment ratio; Condensation; Shear layer mixing; Pitot pressure; CFD (computational fluid dynamics) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544215014504
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:energy:v:93:y:2015:i:p2:p:2030-2041

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.082

Access Statistics for this article

Energy is currently edited by Henrik Lund and Mark J. Kaiser

More articles in Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().