Advancing the science of evaluating Collegiate Recovery Program processes and outcomes: A recovery capital perspective
Emily A. Hennessy,
Lindsey M. Nichols,
Tiffany B. Brown and
Emily E. Tanner-Smith
Evaluation and Program Planning, 2022, vol. 91, issue C
Abstract:
Collegiate recovery programs (CRPs) offer resources and programming for postsecondary students in addiction recovery to ensure they can initiate or maintain their recovery and complete college. To achieve these goals, CRPs offer a variety of activities that research and theory suggests should produce positive outcomes among their students; yet the lack of systematic evaluation research in this area means it is unknown which programming components may drive outcomes. Recovery capital theory posits a variety of factors at multiple ecological levels that might influence students’ recovery experience and their engagement and success in community programs like CRPs. To address this complexity in research and evaluation work on CRPs, we provide a recovery capital-oriented theory of change and logic model for CRP evaluations, and demonstrate how this model could be used with an exemplar case. This is followed by a recovery capital-oriented data collection toolkit for future research and evaluation. These efforts should help to inform program planners and evaluators interested in understanding the influence of the ecosystem of recovery-oriented systems of care in CRPs for emerging adults.
Keywords: College Students; Collegiate Recovery Program; Evaluation; Logic Model; Recovery Capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718922000118
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:epplan:v:91:y:2022:i:c:s0149718922000118
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102057
Access Statistics for this article
Evaluation and Program Planning is currently edited by Jonathan A. Morell
More articles in Evaluation and Program Planning from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().