Interaction between agroforestry and women's land tenure security in sub-Saharan Africa: A matrilocal perspective

Emmanuel O. Benjamin, Oreoluwa Ola, Johannes Sauer and Gertrud Buchenrieder, neé Schrieder

Forest Policy and Economics, 2021, vol. 133, issue C

Abstract: The co-existence of customary and statutory land tenure institutions makes land tenure a complex issue for farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Furthermore, land tenure systems are gendered, which is often to the disadvantage of women. We outline a land tenure framework, which acknowledges the interactions between gender and different land tenure institutions and their impact on investments in agroforestry. Agroforestry is widely acknowledged as a conservation measure. Investment in agroforestry is also associated with claiming ownership of land under different tenure systems and changes the character of land. The study concentrated on female smallholder tea out-growers in the Mulanje District of southern Malawi, where the matrilineal land inheritance system predominates. The land tenure framework is econometrically validated by analyzing data of 228 women farmers surveyed in 2018. Results suggest women famers who gained access to land through inheritance or purchase were less likely to invest in agroforestry. However, married (non-native) women farmers have a higher probability to invest in agroforestry after purchasing land, likely to demark their access right in relation to their husbands. An understanding of the interactions between various gendered land tenure institutional setups and agroforestry is useful to the discourse on land tenure security, conservation, and women empowerment.

Keywords: Customary law; Land tenure; Agroforestry; Women; Malawi; Sub-Saharan Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934121002239
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:133:y:2021:i:c:s1389934121002239

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102617

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().