EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Empirical linkages between devolved tenure systems and forest conditions: Selected case studies and country experiences

Miaoying Shi, Runsheng Yin, Leo Zulu, Jiaguo Qi, Mark Freudenberger and Matthew Sommerville

Forest Policy and Economics, 2016, vol. 73, issue C, 286-293

Abstract: In addition to those more rigorous empirical analyses that have been summarized in the previous paper, a large number of case studies have tackled the linkages between devolved tenure systems and forest conditions. Some of the selected case studies and meta-analyses of these and other cases are described, so are the experiences of forest tenure devolution in several countries. We argue that complementary to those empirical analyses reviewed earlier, these two elements are also essential to anyone who is interested in a clear understanding of the specific contents, contexts of forest tenure devolution in different parts of the world and the possible causal linkages between devolved forest rights and improved forest condition.

Keywords: Forest devolution; Tenure reform; Community-based management; Forest condition; Impact evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934116301058
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:73:y:2016:i:c:p:286-293

DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.018

Access Statistics for this article

Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott

More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:73:y:2016:i:c:p:286-293