Influence of the geographical scope on the research foci of sustainable forest management: Insights from a content analysis
Andrea Sutterlüty,
Nenad Šimunović,
Franziska Hesser,
Tobias Stern,
Andreas Schober and
Kurt Christian Schuster
Forest Policy and Economics, 2018, vol. 90, issue C, 142-150
Abstract:
Individual approaches to sustainable forest management have to be operationalized according to the regionally specific environmental conditions and stakeholder requirements. Unique regional socio-economic conditions also significantly impact stakeholder requirements of globally acting forest sector companies. Therefore, forest-based sector decision makers have to be aware of regionally-specific and context sensitive sustainability concerns, when assessing and prioritizing sustainability issues. Sustainability research is considered to have a regional focus and a problem-driven perspective. Hence, research foci of scientific discussion on sustainable forest management can provide insight into regional differences and problems of sustainable forest management. We conducted a quantitative content analysis of 643 scientific abstracts in the context of sustainable forest management. We observed 16 different topic categories, out of which the topics of forest health and conservation and forest management practices represent the dominant foci. Furthermore, our results confirm a strong impact of geographic scope on the research foci. For example, the issues of climate change mitigation and adaptation are significantly more investigated in the Global North while social impacts of forest management are more researched in the Global South. Our findings suggest that decision makers should consider more than environmental issues when selecting corporate social responsibility activities or when making environmental policies. Otherwise, they can potentially overlook the impacts of forest management which are of high regional importance and intensively investigated by the scientific community.
Keywords: Quantitative content analysis; Corporate social responsibility; CSR; Sustainable development; Forestry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934117303325
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:forpol:v:90:y:2018:i:c:p:142-150
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.02.003
Access Statistics for this article
Forest Policy and Economics is currently edited by M. Krott
More articles in Forest Policy and Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().