Systematic review of the methodological quality of clinical guideline development for the management of chronic disease in Europe

Cécile Knai, Serena Brusamento, Helena Legido-Quigley, Vanessa Saliba, Dimitra Panteli, Eva Turk, Josip Car, Martin McKee and Reinhard Busse

Health Policy, 2012, vol. 107, issue 2, 157-167

Abstract: The use of evidence-based clinical guidelines is an essential component of chronic disease management. However, there is well-documented concern about variability in the quality of clinical guidelines, with evidence of persisting methodological shortcomings. The most widely accepted approach to assessing the quality of guidelines is the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. We have conducted a systematic review of the methodological quality (as assessed by AGREE) of clinical guidelines developed in Europe for the management of chronic diseases published since 2000.

Keywords: Clinical guideline; Disease management; Chronic disease; Europe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851012001625
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:107:y:2012:i:2:p:157-167

DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.06.004

Access Statistics for this article

Health Policy is currently edited by Katrien Kesteloot, Mia Defever and Irina Cleemput

More articles in Health Policy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu () and ().