EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Disaggregated research evaluation through median-based characteristic scores and scales: a comparison with the mean-based approach

Gabriel-Alexandru Vîiu

Journal of Informetrics, 2017, vol. 11, issue 3, 748-765

Abstract: Characteristic scores and scales (CSS) were proposed in the late 1980s as a powerful tool in evaluative scientometrics but have only recently begun to be used for systematic, multi-level appraisal. By relying on successive sample means found in citation distributions the CSS method yields performance classes that can be used to benchmark individual units of assessment. This article investigates the theoretical and empirical consequences of a median-based approach to the construction of CSS. Mean and median-based CSS algorithms developed in the R language and environment for statistical computing are applied to citation data of papers from journals indexed in four Web of Science categories: Information Science and Library Science, Social work, Microscopy and Thermodynamics. Subject category-level and journal-level comparisons highlight the specificities of the median-based approach relative to the mean-based CSS. When moving from the latter to the former substantially fewer papers are ascribed to the poorly cited CSS class and more papers become fairly, remarkably or outstandingly cited. This transition is also marked by the well-known “Matthew effect” in science. Both CSS versions promote a disaggregated perspective on research evaluation but differ with regard to emphasis: mean-based CSS promote a more exclusive view of excellence; the median-based approach promotes a more inclusive outlook.

Keywords: Characteristic scores and scales (CSS); Scientometrics; Research evaluation; Disaggregation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157717300901
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:748-765

DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.04.003

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Informetrics is currently edited by Leo Egghe

More articles in Journal of Informetrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:11:y:2017:i:3:p:748-765