Is the new citation-rank approach P100′ in bibliometrics really new?
Michael Schreiber
Journal of Informetrics, 2014, vol. 8, issue 4, 997-1004
Abstract:
The percentile-based rating scale P100 describes the citation impact in terms of the distribution of unique citation values. This approach has recently been refined by considering also the frequency of papers with the same citation counts. Here I compare the resulting P100′ with P100 for an empirical dataset and a simple fictitious model dataset. It is shown that P100′ is not much different from standard percentile-based ratings in terms of citation frequencies. A new indicator P100″ is introduced.
Keywords: Evaluation; Citation analysis; Highly cited publications; Bibliometric rankings; Percentiles (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157714000935
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:infome:v:8:y:2014:i:4:p:997-1004
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.10.001
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Informetrics is currently edited by Leo Egghe
More articles in Journal of Informetrics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().